My mom still talks in wonder, how as a kid, I climbed a fragile tree and was sitting directly above a well when she saw me. Sparks of childhood, perhaps. I'm sure every mom has numerous such things to tell about her kid.
However the sparks don't continue for long, maybe because we grow out of those or because life's responsibilities creep over us. And as we realize those responsibilities, we start to stay away from adventures that could cause liabilities to ourselves or to people around us. We self-impose restrictions on our own freedom that can otherwise hinder us from catering to those responsibilities. Some of those responsibilities are true, and are probably related to our life's purpose if there was any, but many of those are false, and are probably related to our attachments.
As we grow even older, we may also develop what I would like to call the "detachmental indifference", that helps us reach a more mature, more stable state, from where, doing or not doing something, or having or not having something, does not make a significant difference to us. We may not perfect this for a long time, so we may try to combine the partial indifference with our conscience, to guide us during uncertain moments till then.
When I was possibly at this stage, I found myself in many interesting dilemmas. While I didn't want to leave existing false responsibilities unfulfilled, I was so bent on not creating new such ones. While I didn't want to withdraw from existing attachments, I was so bent on not forming new ones. But then there are some things you can't resist beyond a point, especially when you don't know how to. Voila, I've now decided to fall prey to the very unit called the family, that so much bothered me, that I believed primarily upheld human selfishness, that I believed even makes love selfish, and I'm sorry to say so again, that I believed even makes love impure.
The one question on this I want to ask God continues to be the same for years - "Did You create man so he can love everyone equally or did You create man so he can love the world in tiers?" Not having got the chance to meet God so far, and evidently not having found the answer to this question so far, I had no other option but to yield.
But what is all that the society trying to do with marriage?
Don't we want someone for ourselves?
Sure, but if there was no family and everybody was there for everyone else, why do we need someone for ourselves at all?
Don't we want to bequeath our own genes?
Exactly, that is the selfishness I'm talking about.
Won't human species go extinct otherwise?
If we really thought so, we should be saving the millions of children dying in Africa and Asia, before trying to create and save our own.
Don't you think a family is bringing some order in the chaos?
Yes, agreed, and I guess there stops all the reasons for marriage. I think any other reason to falsely sanctify marriage is ill-founded.
This is just my opinion. It can be as right or as wrong as yours is.
A wrong topic ends with a wrong conclusion because it had a wrong analysis, let me come back to this with a better analysis after finding out why marriage has survived for so long to create the order we so dearly need in our system.
However the sparks don't continue for long, maybe because we grow out of those or because life's responsibilities creep over us. And as we realize those responsibilities, we start to stay away from adventures that could cause liabilities to ourselves or to people around us. We self-impose restrictions on our own freedom that can otherwise hinder us from catering to those responsibilities. Some of those responsibilities are true, and are probably related to our life's purpose if there was any, but many of those are false, and are probably related to our attachments.
As we grow even older, we may also develop what I would like to call the "detachmental indifference", that helps us reach a more mature, more stable state, from where, doing or not doing something, or having or not having something, does not make a significant difference to us. We may not perfect this for a long time, so we may try to combine the partial indifference with our conscience, to guide us during uncertain moments till then.
When I was possibly at this stage, I found myself in many interesting dilemmas. While I didn't want to leave existing false responsibilities unfulfilled, I was so bent on not creating new such ones. While I didn't want to withdraw from existing attachments, I was so bent on not forming new ones. But then there are some things you can't resist beyond a point, especially when you don't know how to. Voila, I've now decided to fall prey to the very unit called the family, that so much bothered me, that I believed primarily upheld human selfishness, that I believed even makes love selfish, and I'm sorry to say so again, that I believed even makes love impure.
The one question on this I want to ask God continues to be the same for years - "Did You create man so he can love everyone equally or did You create man so he can love the world in tiers?" Not having got the chance to meet God so far, and evidently not having found the answer to this question so far, I had no other option but to yield.
But what is all that the society trying to do with marriage?
Don't we want someone for ourselves?
Sure, but if there was no family and everybody was there for everyone else, why do we need someone for ourselves at all?
Don't we want to bequeath our own genes?
Exactly, that is the selfishness I'm talking about.
Won't human species go extinct otherwise?
If we really thought so, we should be saving the millions of children dying in Africa and Asia, before trying to create and save our own.
Don't you think a family is bringing some order in the chaos?
Yes, agreed, and I guess there stops all the reasons for marriage. I think any other reason to falsely sanctify marriage is ill-founded.
This is just my opinion. It can be as right or as wrong as yours is.
A wrong topic ends with a wrong conclusion because it had a wrong analysis, let me come back to this with a better analysis after finding out why marriage has survived for so long to create the order we so dearly need in our system.
>> Don't we want to bequeath our own genes?
ReplyDelete>> Exactly, that is the selfishness I'm talking about.
I dont think there is anything about selfishness there. As I have mentioned in our discussions before, the fundamental truth (if we are ready to acknowledge it) is that only a very very small % of people really know what their purpose in life is. But all human beings need a purpose for sure, so for the remaining % (including me), the purpose becomes imitating others / being in "sync" with what others do. And this applies to the "passing on genes" too :).
Gopa.
No question about that Gopa, that's why I'm also getting married :)
ReplyDelete>> No question about that Gopa, that's why I'm also getting married :)
ReplyDeleteYour wife will be lucky to get a perfect husband like you man (I hope she is reading this ;-). Wish you a great time ahead.
>> I think any other reason to falsely sanctify marriage is ill-founded.
I too agree that sometimes it feels silly when people come up with all sorts of reasons to sanctify marriage or the "bequeathal of genes", and try to make themselves and the others agree with it when all they need acknowledge is that "I am quite clueless, let me just do what other people are doing" !!
Gopa.
I don't think I've met anyone who accepts truths so unhesitatingly. Your wife should be luckier :D On a serious note, I heard your wife tell me once that she is really lucky :)
ReplyDeleteOk ok, now you go, get beaten up by your wife, I'll also get beaten up, soon enough.
fafu, did u write this blog out of ur intuition? You and Jiddu krishnamurthy think alike.. ennamo poda !!
ReplyDeletebut I wouldn't like a life where every one loves everybody. That would be like a Vikraman movie.. very boring :(
You may be happy to read this:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thebetterindia.com/7123/a-wedding-with-a-difference-that-made-a-difference/#